Quantcast
Mar 21
The PM and Social Conservative

[SOURCE]

The PM has been on my thoughts lately.  And not in a good way.  I’ve blogged here and here about her being a ‘Social Conservative’, which is really just an excuse to hide the way she really feels, she’s trying hard to appeal to those who are conservative and probably belive in the Mandating Sky Fairy.

Gillard is anything but a social conservative, her behaviour and attitudes aren’t worth a steaming bowl of alpaca guts.

Here she is, shacked up with her non-husband.  And good luck to her.  May her relationships be whatever she wants.  How lucky she is to have ditched the shackles of a socially conservative society where she would have been regarded as a loose woman and unworthy of recognition in our society. She would never have reached the lofty heights of Prime Minister twenty or thirty years ago.  For fuck sake, she’s living outside wedlock, and it’s not the first time1!  She’s lucky that she can pick which parts she wants to be a conservative on, and which parts she wants to drop.  She’s lucky that Australia no longer gives a flying rancid fucking rats arse about personal relationships.

It all suits her life style very well.  Which is exactly the same as those toady christians.  It’s funny how their view of god always aligns with their own view of how the world should be.

Gillard has not offered one bit of reasoning as to why the Marriage Act in Australia, which was tampered with by the Howard Governement in 2004, should remain as it is.  There is no justification for using history as a reason to continue to discriminate.

“”I had a pro-union, pro-Labor upbringing in a quite conservative family, in a sense of personal values. I mean we believed in lots of things that are old fashioned in the modern age,” she said.

“We believed in politeness and thrift and fortitude and doing duty and diligence. These are things that were part of my upbringing. They’re part of who I am.”

Those things aren’t just available to social conservatives, nor are they old fashioned.  These things are part of our humanity.  Sure, you can believe in lots of things that are ‘old fashioned’ but can you justify your continued stance against marriage equality?

No, I didn’t think so.

  1.  Wikipedia reports relationships with several other people over the years SOURCE
Mar 21
The bible is rubbish

[SOURCE]

On Sunday our lovely PM said she didn’t support gay marriage, I blogged about it here.

Of course, Jim Wallace over at ACL is wetting himself with glee.  He’s got a warm feeling because

her recognition that the Bible is worth studying because it underpins much of western literature

Sane people understand the bible is a collection of stories that have very little value outside religion.  Sane people understand that the bible is not a historical record.  Sane people understand that the bible can not be used as justification for making laws for everyone.

…and the place of the Bible in shaping so much that is good about modern Australian society

Good?  You use the bible to force religion into schools, you use the bible to discriminate against gay people, you use the bible to refuse people the right to die, you use the bible to prevent abortion, you use the bible to  limit scientific research.  For fuck sake,  the bible has no place in law making.

It’s time to question what good the bible is in our modern society, you know what I think?  Why don’t you take your stupid fucking book and piss on it.

Mar 20
5 Conclusions I Firmly Believe

[SOURCE]

Over at the The Christian Post Perry Noble has been talking about things he firmly believes but leaves out the really good stuff that he also firmly believes.

He’s a sweet guy that thinks jesus will save him for his wise words in saving all those sinners.  He’s excited because he’s been reading 1 Timothy 2:3-7 – hey, 1 Timothy 2 has 15 verses.  Why are you just picking out a few?

Let’s have a look at 1 Timothy 2 that he talks so fondly of:

1 I urge, then, first of all, that petitions, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for all people—

All people – how inclusive!

2 for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness.

Yes, kings and leaders need to live in peace, I can see why he likes that line.

3 This is good, and pleases God our Savior,

This is where he’s getting excited, it’s nice that god is happy when the kings are happy.  It explains so much about war.

4 who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.

Oh yes, I can see why he thinks this is important, gives him a puffed up sense of importance, but if their god wants all people to be saved, why did he make it so fucking hard, the rules are impossible to follow, vague and inconsistent.

5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus,

I bet he’s nearly hard by now, one god!  Everyone else must be wrong, so we best listen to him.  Oh, great, but now we have to go to god through he’s middle man- but wait, isn’t that his son?

6 who gave himself as a ransom for all people. This has now been witnessed to at the proper time.

Gave himself?  I thought god told him to do it.  But there you have it, jesus was selfless, just like this bozo, he thinks he’s giving himself as a ransom too – so that he might save you.  Arrogant prick.

7 And for this purpose I was appointed a herald and an apostle—I am telling the truth, I am not lying—and a true and faithful teacher of the Gentiles.

Good on Perry Noble thinks he’s been appointed.   He says:

I was called, gifted, equipped and am expected to be a HERALD of the GOSPEL!!! Once again, if I am not focused on proclaiming the Gospel to a world that does not know Christ…then I am NOT fulfilling HIS primary calling on my life!

Ahem.  And he actually believes this shit?  Are you serious?  And what about the bible passage, you have to tell us this is the truth?  You’re not lying?  Why do you say that?  Do you think we might think you’re making this crap up?

Now the rest of it he doesn’t want to talk about, but you can bet he thinks this is just as important – but he knows how unpopular this would be.  Mind you, it’s so akin to some rabid muslims making sure their woman are always covered and never seen outside the home.

8 Therefore I want the men everywhere to pray, lifting up holy hands without anger or disputing.

Well, that’s not working too well is it.

9 I also want the women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, adorning themselves, not with elaborate hairstyles or gold or pearls or expensive clothes,

Hang on, men should pray by lifting up their hands, but women should dress modestly, they should behave themeselves and not wear expensive clothes.

10 but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God.

And who decides what’s appropriate and what’s a good deed?

11 A woman[a] should learn in quietness and full submission.

Oh, well, where does that leave our Prime Minister?  Hilary Clinton?  Well, women everywhere really.

12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.

Ummm… problem…. women are people too.  Why do you want to shut them up?

13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve.

Oh, right, so that means that it’s all ok.  Men are more important because they came first.

14 And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.

Yeah, the fucking bitch.  That cheap fucking harlot.  She’s the downfall of all humanity.

15 But women[c] will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.

See – it’s all ok.  Even though those vile wenches fucked it up for the rest of us, if they have kiddies and continue to believe and live in love and holiness and with propriety, whatever that is, as long as they shut the fuck up and don’t get above themselves.

But does our friend, Perry Noble touch any of that?  Well no, he just focuses on the first couple of verses.  3-7 – the good stuff about saving people, but he nicely ignores the bad stuff.  He is quite happy to let women shut up and have babies.  They’re not to be trusted.

An appalling attitude, no wonder christianity is fucked.  And you mark my words, if you let radical fundamentalist of the christian persuasion run their radical social agenda women will be treated like dirt and blamed for every wrong doing on the face of the earth.

 

 

Feb 1
Catholics and Respect

It would help me in considering your request for a meeting to receive an assurance that you and the AME do not regard opposition to same-sex marriage in itself as a form of prejudice and discrimination, and that you are prepared to say this publicly.

This is from George Hell’s Christmas letters to Australian Marriage Equality.  I blogged about that here and here.

Well, it would seem that the AME have agreed to his demands.

What?

According to Australian Marriage Equality National Convener, Alex Greenwich,

“As the debate on marriage equality intensifies this year, it is important that both sides conduct themselves with maturity, respect, and committ to using truthful and factual arguements”

Mr Greenwich said he hopes both sides can start the debate by identifying common ground and shared values.

Mature? The church, the one that thinks sex is only for making babies? Respect? The church that thinks and says gay people are disordered? Truthful? That god ordained marriage? Factual? Have you read their bible? Arguements? With Catholics? You’re kidding me, they’re not changing for you or Galileo (ok, 500 years).  Shared values?  What a load of holy shit.

It would seem that AME have agreed to give an assurance that they will not regard opposition to same-sex marriage in itself as a from or prejudice and discrimination.

This is despite the AME website under their Case for Marriage Equality saying this:

Exclusion of same-sex attracted people from marriage also sends out the message that discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation is acceptable.

This negative messages is amplified by the fact that, since 85 federal laws were amended to recognise same-sex de facto partners in 2008, the Marriage Act is the only remaining federal law which still discriminates, and because marriage is considered an important  legal and social institution.

The negative message sent out by discrimination in marriage foster prejudice, discrimination and unequal treatment against same-sex relationships in the wider community.

You see, exclusion of same-sex people getting married sends out a message of discrimination, it sends out a message that we are unequal, it fosters prejudice and makes us second class citizens.

And just why does the church oppose marriage between two people of the same sex?  Because it means that the sex between the couple is not open to procreation.  It’s because their bible says that sex between men is an abomination and that people that engage in a bit of backdoor entry must be stoned.  To death.  That’s with rocks, not drugs.

Sure, they don’t come out and say that any more.  In some places people are still hanged for being gay, but not here.  We must be grateful!

This isn’t a two way street here.  The catholics will never agree to same-sex marriage, on any account, ever.  To even consider their point of view as anything other than discriminatory is ridiculous.  They may well say that their point of view is about protecting the family and the sancity of marriage.  They may well say that they don’t hate homosexuals, but just because some PR expert manage to put a spin on it doesn’t change the real meaning of their intent.

The church’s own rule book, CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, has this to say about the gay folk:

Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,tradition has always declared that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.”142 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved1.

We are intriniscally disordered, contrary to natural law and sex between members of the same sex is grave depravity.

But then the clincher, Under no circumstances can they be approved. There you have it.  Not homophobic, not discriminatory, and not flying in the face of our modern understanding of sexuality.

Sex will always be for the catholics between a man and a woman and only with an eye for making babies.  There is no other purpose for it.  Just look at Archbishop Miller in Vancover Canada, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops released a statement2:

Married people living chastely can have vibrant sex lives. In the relationship between a man and a woman, chastity helps them love each other as persons rather than make each other an object of pleasure or satisfaction. Despite what the media and Hollywood suggest, the value of sexual intercourse does not lie in recreation, or physical gratification. Any physical pleasure should lead toward the ultimate expression of love between husband and wife, the total self-giving of one person to another. Sexual intercourse in marriage can be so intimate that it becomes an emotional, intellectual, physical and spiritual experience. It strengthens and completes the bond of marriage. That is why the sexual act has to be unitive and procreative and why some kinds of sexual activity are not chaste. Though pleasure may be present, some acts are a misuse of sex when they fall short of what God intends.

Archbishop Michael Miller

Another Frock

There’s so much rhetoric here that I just don’t know where to start.  Apart from the fact that me and the love llama have an active sexual relationship, treat each other like objects of pleasure and satisfaction and love it.  We deeply love each other on an emotional, intellectual and physical level.  So there.  Let us get married, oh wait, we can’t in the eyes of the church because we participate in the ‘some kinds of sexual activity are not chaste’ variety, and while pleasure is present there will never be any babies from it, so we are misusing it.  Fuck, it feels nice but.

The ‘Pastoral Letter’ from the Canadians is for young people, they are spreading this vile understanding of human sexuality and marriage to young people.

So what has this to do with Australia?  Well that’s easy, it’s catholic, which means universal.  The church moves as one big virus on the face of the planet.

There will never be understanding or acceptance from the church.  They will never allow same sex marriage, and they will always treat gay people as sinners and unworthy of membership.  They speak of respect and truth and while their words are nice, their meaning is ugly and most unwelcome.

I don’t support AME in this latest endeavour, the church is dictating terms, terms set by men who wear stupid outfits, don’t have sex, don’t have families and have no fucking idea about real life.

They live in a world of bowing and scraping, they use titles like Your Eminence, Your Grace, Father and other self given wanky titles like Your Holiness.  They’re not real, and they don’t deserve our respect.

  1. SOURCE
  2. The Pastoral Letter is intended for young people to tell them that sex is for marriage only, and only to make babies. SOURCE
Jan 30
A new song!

[SOURCE]

Oh those clever christians at Hillsong!  They’ve recorded a song for the victims of the Queensland floods.

It’s called “It Is Well With My Soul” penned in 1873 by a man after his children were drowned when a boat sank.  (Did you just cringe?)

The new updated and sparkly version includes these lyrics:

When peace like a river, attendeth my way,
When sorrows like sea billows roll;
Whatever my lot, Thou hast taught me to say,
It is well, it is well, with my soul.

So, you’re raising funds for the victims of a flood caused by lots of rain and raging rivers that are just simply not running very peacefully and are certainly attending the way of death and destruction.  And this makes sense to you?

Then, whatever my lot?  So, god throws down gigalitres of water and you just shrug and say “Whatever my lot, It is well with my soul”?

Ultimately, worship is a response to God. This song is powerful because the confession is, that though everything around me may fail, our God never fails.

Let me get this right, all that water, all that loss of life and property and your god never fails?  Therefore your god is a bastard.  He could have easily let the rain fall in 10mm lots every day between 8 and 9 p.m over a month or so.

Massive Fail.

Jan 30
The Virus Spreads

It should come as no surprise to you that the religion virus spreads, and seems to be spreading quite well in Queensland. Pastors Norman and Barbara Miller at the “CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL RECONCILIATION AND PEACE INC” have been spreading their particular variant of the god bug since they:

planted a church in Cairns in 1996 and called it the Pentecostal Church of Reconciliation.

Planted?  Oh, I see, like a mould that grows and needs a damn good dose of vinegar to clean it up.

They are really fairly run of the mill fundie types, running a small insignificant church without the direct supervision of anyone really.  They can do as they please.  They have a vision statement on their website, and among the things that they would like to happen:

To promote RECONCILIATION of Jew with Gentile, while teaching on the Jewish roots of the Christian Faith and Israel’s role in End-time events.

There’s nothing like the End-Times to sort out the extreme nutters.  I think that this is code for wanting to make jews accept that their messiah has been and gone, it’s not clear.  However, they probably hold this strange notion that jesus will return to Jerusalem and will be pissed off if the jews aren’t running the show.

To engage in Spiritual warfare & Intercession on behalf of the saints & for end-time harvest

Warfare?  End-time harvest?

Apostle Norman and Prophetess Barbara are the leaders of the Bethany Gate Australia under ‘Jerusalem House of Prayer for All Nations’

Hang on, what happened to the title of Pastor?  Now he’s an Apostle (of what?) and she’s a Prophetess (I wonder were we can get her prophecies from).  I’m not at all sure what the Bethany Gate Australia is.

However, we believe the Lord is calling us to make a fresh start with a new local church name – Healing Rivers Church.

How can you do anything other than roll your eyes?  God is so great that he calls you to make a fresh start and change the name of your self-proclaimed church but allows people to perish in the recent floods.  Good to see what the priorities are.

But wait, there’s a video!  They both tell how important god is to Australia and finish with this:

Affirm today that the Government of this nation is on the shoulders of Jesus Christ.

Well jesus fucking christ, so that’s who’s really running the show, and I didn’t even see his name on the ballot paper.

Jan 29
Into Battle

[SOURCE]

Bill Muehlenberg is a rich source of topics for me.  Plenty of blogs about him.  He’s about as right-wing as they come and actually believes his own shit.

He thinks that the world is a battlefield, for god, and he is one of his god’s warriors, out there, knee deep in battle, for the lord!

Now that dick has really shown how incredibly stupid his religion is by comparing the real life battles, where people really die to his imagined battle with the devil.

Corporal Ben Roberts-Smith is a real hero.  In Afghanistan he stood in front of bullets, shot the enemy dead and saved his mates.  He put his life on the line.  Reading his story itself was enough to make this Llama excrete smelly stuff from the rear end.

And this is a real life battle we are talking about, people on both sides are dying, and they’re doing it to counter the Taliban and reduce their influence on the world.  Regardless of your politics, the Australian soldiers need our support.

Me mate Silly Billy quite likes this quote from Corporal Roberts-Smith:

I saw my mates getting ripped up, so I decided to move forward. I wasn’t going to sit there and do nothing.

Yes, I agree with him, but then Bill says this:

I quite like that. Not only is it a great attitude to have in the field of combat, but it applies much more widely. I am thinking here about the Christian life. The Bible consistently portrays the believer’s life as one of battle, warfare, and constant fighting.

You actually want to compare your imagined battle with the real battle going on about you?  You tosser.

Consider some of the many external threats we face:

  • False religions
  • Attacks by unbelievers
  • Secularist crusades
  • Cultic invasions
  • Moral and cultural challenges
  • Various assaults on the Christian faith
  • “The world, the flesh and the devil”

Or if you belong to some fundamental Islamic tradition, say the Taliban, this is what they say:

Consider some of the many external threats we face:

  • False religions
  • Attacks by unbelievers
  • Secularist crusades
  • Cultic invasions
  • Moral and cultural challenges
  • Various assaults on the Islamic faith
  • “The world, the flesh and the devil”

Hang on a minute… wait on… that’s the same.

These are just a few of the battlefields that we find ourselves in. Every day we are engaged in some sort of battle, some sort of attack or some sort of assault. And the casualties are high and continue to mount. All around us we find believers who are burnt out or worn down or fed up.

Billy Baby, these are not battlefields, there are no bullets, nobody is actually dying.  The attacks are not physical, the assaults are not physical.  There are no casualties.  It’s a disgusting analogy to make, and makes a mockery of the brave work of the forces engaged in daily real-life threatening situations.

Every day pastors around the world are giving up the ministry. They have had enough. They are sick of all the criticism and ingratitude and abuse.

You make it sound like a bad thing.  There’s a reason that they get criticism and abuse, it’s because your religion is self-serving imagined crap and unworthy of respect.  And as for the ingratitude.. what’s to be grateful about?  Religion is used by people like you to control and influence people.  You reek of ingratitude when it comes to the efforts of our military forces and your attempt to cheapen the work they do is reprehensible.

Every day believers are being shot down in defeat or discouragement or immorality or pride or worldliness or liberal theology or men-pleasing, etc.

Oh, for fuck sake, do you make this twaddle up?  Get a grip man, oh, hang on, perhaps your grip is too tight.

All over the battle field our brothers and sisters are fallen, tied down, outgunned and overwhelmed.

Just what sort of senseless analogy is this Billy Saggy Baggy?  What a horrid image you draw and then you dare to compare that to real life battles where people have fallen, have been tied down, outgunned and overwhelmed.

All over the world Christians are wounded, under attack, outnumbered, or putting up the white flag of surrender. But the most tragic reality of all is that many believers do not even know we are in a battle.

Jesus fucking christ, what a fucking cunty attitude that is.  This is truly an unbelievable attitude to have and the imagery you are trying to provoke and use as a method of showing just how hard you poor little fucking sucky christians have it is tasteless and just plain pathetic.

While you’re whining about how bad things are for the true believer, those on the other side are saying the same thing.  You are no better than the Taliban, and other religious extremists.

I am truly disgusted, but not surprised.  May your front lawn be subjected to great amounts of alpaca poo.  Best get the gumboots outs.

Jan 28
Abortion Booklet

[SOURCE]

Margaret Forrester works for the NHS in England as a mental health worker in a health centre.  She was suspended last year because she was distributing a booklet on abortion in an abortion clinic.  She’d given the booklet to a fellow staff member because she felt that the NHS wasn’t giving enough information.  She’s also a catholic.  There’s a little bit of crazy on both sides, however, she appears to have been re-instated1.

We all know that religious nutters think that abortion is wrong, against the will of god and must be stopped.  The trouble with nutters is that they won’t listen to the experts and flat out lie to push their own point.

The NHS says it’s normal to feel a range of emotions after an abortion:

It’s normal to experience a range of emotions after an abortion, such as relief, sadness, happiness or feelings of loss. [SOURCE]

Seems like good practical advice.

Of course, the christian world is now very excited that Ms Forrester has been re-instated.  They talk about how all opinions should be offered for women who want to have an abortion, they talk about free speech and how important it is.  Over at defendchristians.org they said this:

Even though everything in the booklet was true and Margaret was eventually exonerated, Margaret almost lost her job simply for sharing a politically incorrect opinion.

So, let’s have a look at the booklet that she was passing around and talking about, it’s called “Forsaken – Women from Taunton talk about Abortion” and the website explains:

This book is about the reality of Post Abortion Syndrome (also known as “Post Abortion Stress”, “Post Abortion Trauma” or “Post Abortion Stress Syndrome”).

So, what’s Post Abortion Syndrome I hear you ask?  Well, I’m glad you asked, the booklet website says this about PAS:

The term “Post Abortion Syndrome” was first used in 1981 by Vincent Rue, a psychologist and trauma specialist, in testimony before the United States Congress. He had observed post-traumatic stress disorder which developed in response to the stress of abortion. He proposed the name “Post Abortion Syndrome” (PAS) to describe it.

Well, that sound fairly impressive.  Like I should actually believe there is such a thing.  Of course, I like to check these things, so I slipped over to Wikipedia and sure enough there is an article on PAS – in fact the first paragraph is exactly the same, but then read on:

The American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association do not recognize PAS as an actual diagnosis or condition, and it is not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR or in the ICD-10 list of psychiatric conditions.

Oh?  But this important information doesn’t seem to have made it on the Forsaken site, in fact they go on to list a range of symptoms and they also claim that the book is about the ‘reality of Post Abortion Syndrome’ to which we are entitle to look a little surprised, purse our lips and go “oh?” with an upward inflection towards the end of the H to signify surprise.

Wikipedia goes on to say:

While some studies have shown a correlation between abortion and clinical depression, anxiety, suicidal behaviors, or adverse effects on women’s sexual functions for a small number of women, these correlations may be explained by pre-existing social circumstances and emotional health.

So when the defendchristians.org website says that everything in the booklet is true they are either deluded or flat out lying.

Ms Forrester is quoted as saying:

“Women need to be able to make a fully informed decision about having an abortion, as it will impact their lives forever.  They need to be made aware of all of the risks, including the well documented mental health risks.”

I agree, we all should be fully informed about the impact on our lives for any procedure that we are undertaking, however, we need true and accurate information, not hogwash that has no support in the medical and scientific world and is driven by people’s personal opinions and unsubstantiated claims, and especially not when they are driven from some fanciful belief in an imaginary pixie fairy wombat in the sky that kills his own son because one woman made a mistake and the rest of us are to blame.  That’s why Ms. Forrester you should keep your perverted version of the truth to your self.  It has no place in your professional life.

It’s worth reading this blog by  PERSONALFAILURE at Forever In Hell, she talks about the religious nutters and PAS – it’s very compelling.

Ms Forrester should have been sacked, and in the words of PERSONALFAILURE

Again and again and again, fuck off.

  1.  After claims of being bullied, she now appears to have a better job SOURCE
Dec 3
David Silverman vs. Fox News Panel

December 3, 2010 on Fox News


Nov 13
Islam+Government=Cruelty
How much can we respect religion? I don't mean religious people, they're people and they deserve respect. But does a belief deserve respect? And what does it mean to respect a belief?

In Pakistan, a nuclear threat to the world frequently referred to as the most dangerous nation on Earth, is a violent Islamic theocracy. Like any nation controlled by dogma, the people, the actual living human beings, come second to the superstition. In America, we are free because our government doesn't (ideally) favor any religion. Of course, more than often it does favor a particular brand of Christianity, but at least the U.S. government has enough checks and balances to keep religion from directly running everything with a iron fist. It's not just that Islam is cruel or Christianity is cruel, they both are viciously cruel, but in America, the people come first. In Pakistan and Iran and Saudi Arabia and other nations where religion rules, superstition comes first. Nonsense comes first. And when something other than the people come first, any cost is justifiable.

Add that misplaced priority to this: If you believe in one religion, you reject all others. So if a Christian lives in a society where Islam rules, that Christian is an insult to the god (what's it's ridiculous name? Oh, right, allahlalalalalalalala). 

So we've got a dangerous nation who puts a silly ancient story above caring for people, plus an individual which threatens the society by having a different religion; it equals this:



Asia Bibi, a 45-year-old mother-of-five, denies blasphemy and told investigators that she was being persecuted for her faith in a country where Christians face routine harassment and discrimination.
Christian groups and human rights campaigners condemned the verdict and called for the blasphemy laws to be repealed.
Her supporters say she will now appeal against the sentence handed down in a local court in the town of Sheikhupura, near Lahore, Pakistan.
Ashiq Masih, her husband, said he had not had the heart to break the news to two of their children.
"I haven't told two of my younger daughters about the court's decision," he said. "They asked me many times about their mother but I can't get the courage to tell them that the judge has sentenced their mother to capital punishment for a crime she never committed." Mrs Bibi has been held in prison since June last year.
The court heard she had been working as a farmhand in fields with other women, when she was asked to fetch drinking water.
Some of the other women – all Muslims – refused to drink the water as it had been brought by a Christian and was therefore "unclean", according to Mrs Bibi's evidence, sparking a row.
Not to mention, it's not just Christians that societies oppressed by Islam hate. They'd kill me too for blogging about atheism.


In the West Bank town of Qalqiliya, 26 year-old Walid Husayin was arrested for not believing in God. While the West Bank is predominantly Muslim, the Palestinian Authority which governs the region is known as being one of the most liberal in the Arab world and supports a more secular government and yet now Husayin faces life in prison and possibly the death penalty for being an atheist.

Walid Husayin is a blogger and has created a facebook account under a false name in which he wrote some critical things about Islam and Allah. He even created several facebook groups mocking the dominant religion in his town. In one group, he jokingly claimed to be God and instructed followers to smoke marijuana.

 Keep this in mind the next time someone tries to suggest that government should be influenced by religion.
Sep 29
Creeping homophobia



Let me take you back, briefly, to 2004. I lived in Washington D.C. that summer and the political tensions were palpable. Perhaps our country never recovered from the divisiveness this election brought. Karl Rove unpacked his bag of political tricks, Michael Moore released a conspiracy-laden attack on the Bush administration, 527 groups came to prominence, the media and intelligence communities were still reeling from the administration's outing of an active CIA agent one year earlier. And, on top of all that, there was much focus on one of the right wing's favorite scare tactics: Boys kissing.

In a politically convenient moment, President Bush pushed forth The Marriage Protection Act, which acted to block challenges to a previous act, the Defense of Marriage Act. The Marriage Protection Act passed in the House before the election, but eventually died in the Senate. But the right-wing media forces were able to use that legislation to prop up Christian right zealots like Tony Perkins and James Dobson. They mobilized the Christian right quite successfully and it wasn't solely on the issue of gay marriage. That topic was just a launching pad to give Christian America something to rally behind. A reason to start voting the same way. Once Christians were convinced that gay marriage was a threat, it was easy for the right to present slippery slope arguments on what would happen to our country if Senator John Kerry was elected president. Christian culture, they seemed to suggest, was about to topple and crumble across America unless you vote for George W. Bush. Bush won a very narrow victory.

Homophobia works as a great scare tactic for right wing politicians. On the left, openly homosexual politicians like Barney Frank admit who they are and move on with their careers. On the right, homosexuals are encouraged to suppress any information about their sexuality. Ever wonder why that is? Well, isn't it clear? The right wing can't use homophobia as a tool anymore if it's exposed that there are a number of gay republicans in Congress. So, when outed, gay republicans are asked to step down and continue denying their sexuality.

Cut to 2010. Even though it's not a presidential election, it's a big election year. Republicans hope to see another 1994, when they took the House and the Senate (incidentally, it was that House and Senate under Republican control that would pass the original Defense of Marriage Act of 1996). You may be interested to know that Congressman Bob Barr, who authored the act was also staunchly anti-abortion, but that didn't stop him from procuring an abortion for his wife, who he would (in a show of respect to traditional marriage) soon divorce. And even Barr eventually came out against DOMA and now favors a 2009 bill that would at least provide same-sex partners to receive federal benefits. It should come as no surprise that Barr is no longer with the Republican party. He now considers himself a libertarian.

But here we are with another election on the horizon and what do we see splattered across our front pages? Gays, gays, gays. The growing Tea Party movement (which makes me shudder to admit their popularity) is running hard on the Bush/Rove model of homophobia. Of course, there's Delaware's Christine O'Donnell's well-publicized campaign to 'cure' homosexuals. Then there's the recent debacle over Don't Ask Don't Tell. Nevada's Sharron Angle is battling adoption by gay couples. However, the Tea Party's endorsement of established Republican Sen. Jim DeMint, who was all tied up in the C Street scandal last year, shows their true colors. They're not a new wave of conservative libertarians. They're the same old Republicans, just more religious and more nuts. This week DeMint defended comments he made in (say it with me) 2004 condemning both homosexuals and unmarried women as unfit to teach in a public school classroom. He now thinks he's taking the high road by standing up for his 'moral opinion' even if the media doesn't like it. You can bet that plays well to conservatives.

Here we are, six years later and the Republicans, the Tea Party who claim to be the 'new conservatives,' break out the same old bag of tricks, from the same old people. The same old, I'm just like you, my morals are straight outta the Bible, mom, football, apple pie, traditional family, gays are sinners, easily understood, thought-terminating clichés.

And it's not just me saying so: A new poll out today explains exactly who these teabaggers are: The Christian right.
Sep 3
Christians demand Obama adhere to Christian law, expose their own hypocrisy


There's a disconnect between the way some right-wing Christians act and the things they say. Let's look at two popular arguments the especially paranoid wing of the right have been making lately. Now, I'm not saying every Republican makes these arguments, but when nearly a third of Republicans think this, it's time to dispel some myths. First off, President Obama has made his religious beliefs clear since before his campaign for the presidency. Yet, with black skin and a weird name and a dedication to bridging cultural gaps, Obama is easily named by psychopaths as a conspirator in a secretive Muslim plot to take over America. At the same time, the Islamic community center in downtown Manhattan is being seen as a 'victory Mosque' by the right. The claim persists that Muslims are trying to impose Sharia Law (and, in particular, the Christian rights complete misunderstanding of what 'Sharia Law' means).

Now, I'm no psychologist, but it seems pretty clear to me that when one groups makes a broad claim about another group without first having any real in-depth understanding of the 1st group, that there's probably a little bit of projection going on. That is to say, Christian conservatives who certainly have no understanding of Islam or Sharia Law, who only learn about it via flawed and biased sources like Fox or Youtube or Pat Robertson, are in fact assigning attributes they themselves possess to Muslims. Do Muslims want to take over the country, the world, and impose strict Sharia Law that calls for the stoning of adulterers and rape victims? Sure, some. But that's a radical approach that few even in Islamic countries adhere to. Do they know nothing of the rebellion against Islamic law in Iran? The only people who want all people to follow one religion are those looking to use the religion for political advantage. While Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may see opportunities in creating an all-Muslim world, that it not the view of the majority of Muslims or even everyone in his own country.

And what about Christians?

Look at their reaction to Obama's speech, posted above. Although Obama states the exact opposite of their fear about Sharia Law or some one-world religion by being all-inclusive and including mentions of Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheists, etc, the religious right are offended that Obama refuses to legislate from the Bible. Do a twitter search for 'Obama' and 'Bible' any day and there will be a litany of uninformed conservative Christians who've had their brains melted by the likes of Fox News, complaining that Obama has mocked the Bible, that he doesn't respect Jesus, that he's not a Christian because no Christian would say these things. So, in their view, it must be reasoned, a true Christian would want to legislate out of the Bible. Sounds a lot like that religious law that they were so worried about. They're projecting their actual expectations about America onto what they see as the 'other.' Muslims. And then there's the amazing leap in logic that any presidential candidate who is Muslim must be suspected of consorting with terrorists, though it's been shown that less than 1% of Muslims have ever had any ties to terrorism.

This is America. And the only path to the religious freedom that our constitution guarantees is to be entirely neutral toward religion in government. That means that there ought be no National Day of Prayer or imposed prayer on public school students or special attention payed to a religious center. Should we know if terrorists secretly plan to use a Mosque as a U.S. base? Of course, that's why we have federal systems designed to seek this sort of information. But we must not start with that suspicion. Terrorist groups like the KKK and abortion-doctor murderers are just as likely to meet in a church and discuss their plans as an al-Qaida cell are to meet in a Mosque.
Jul 20
Hell and the Laws of Thermodynamics
There is no entropy in hell. Eternal Hellfire Violates Thermodynamics by Ian’s BrainDesign custom t-shirts on zazzle.com Share This!
Jul 11
Courtship Promises pt. 1
Jul 4
Al-Anon pt 3: Fertile Ground
Jun 18
June 28, 1998
Jun 6
Homophobia: The Untold Story pt. 6
Jun 5
Counter Apologetics
Apr 29
What makes Oklahoma above the law?


Regular readers may remember I have a particular least favorite state in this union. One that often relies on religious fear and deception and hard right-wing extremism in favor of established American values. Of course, I'm referring to Oklahoma. The government in place here has got to be the most oppressive, ignorant and downright cruel in the nation. I think I'd feel safer driving through that Mexican city in from Dusk till Dawn with all the vampires and Cheech Marin.

Well, these liberty squelching shit stains are at it again, in, perhaps, their most egregious offense. According to a new law, which the state senate had to override a gubernatorial veto to pass, a woman seeking an abortion in the state of Oklahoma must undergo a series of insulting, invasive and cruel measures including being forced to undergo an vaginally-inserted ultrasound (yes, it specifies vaginally-inserted) and be shown the pile of cells before she is treated. As if the state is saying "Look, this is the baby you're killing! Hope you're OK with that!!!" Isn't this the same political group that didn't want the government to even supply a public option for health care? Now they want to shove something up your vagina! Fuck you liberty, hello tyranny.


The new statute requires the person performing the ultrasound to describe the dimensions of the fetus, whether arms, legs and internal organs are visible and whether there is cardiac activity. It also requires the doctor to turn a screen depicting the ultrasound images toward the woman to see them.


OK, you can find out about all the disgusting other provisions yourself and of course, it's not even worth making the argument that this is anything other than state lawmakers trying to shame, guilt and, ultimately, dissuade women out of getting abortions even in cases of rape, incest, forced marriage or who-gives-a-fuck-what-the-reason-is.

But what would make people want to do this? What would make lawmakers want to rule over their people in such a cruel and humiliating manner? Let's examine a few possibilities.

It couldn't be that they're representing their constituents — if that were the case, they would have been a public vote or a ballot measure. They're clearly not interested in what their voters have to say on the matter. Although, even if they did it wouldn't matter. The majority shouldn't be able to dictate the morality of a medical procedure required by a few (especially since it's constitutionally protected).

It couldn't be that they think that this measure will save money, obviously, adding more procedures is going to require more supplies, more working hours, more costs. How's that for 'conservative.'

It couldn't be that they think it's medically beneficial. Of course, an ultrasound in no way prepares or aids either a doctor or a patient for an abortion, I'm a little embarrassed that even needs to be said.

In fact, Linda Meek, executive director of Reproductive Services of Tulsa, told the Associated Press equiring women to listen to a description can be traumatic, she said, especially for rape and incest victims and women with fetal abnormalities or whose pregnancy threatens their own life.

It’s been difficult for some of the patients,” Meek said. “We’ve had patients leave the ultrasound room in tears because of what they had to hear.”

It can't be that, as one of the suspects behind this state-sponsored mass-rape puts it, the aim is to prevent something a woman will regret.

We all know, 80% of women who get abortions don't regret the choice: But 100% of them, at least in Oklahoma, are now to be shamed and humiliated in an effort to change their minds. It's the state trying to influence you. An invasive, unnecessary, litigiously risky, potentially harmful, government mandated, undemocratically-passed piece of government legislation designed to strongly influence the free market? That's not conservative. That's not American. You know what it sounds like to me?

RELIGION


And a particular brand of Christianity. This 'law' is brought to you by the same group of yokels who say that God's displeasure with homosexuals caused the economic collapse.


But even without that anecdote, it's clear that Oklahoma is a stronghold of Christo-fascist fundamentalists. Religions teach you that they're more important than reason, than the Constitution, than human empathy. Save that the religion actually doesn't say anything about abortion, but because a certain group of people have chosen to view it that way, it has become such. Christianity is, according to Christians, against this particular medical procedure and since they believe that their god feels that way, nothing is too harsh for those opposing it. So, even if it's inhumanely cruel to sit a woman in front of a screen with a camera shoved up her vagina screaming "this is what you're killing!!" Even if it goes against everything your particular political party stands for; even if it flies in the face of the constitution and the judicial system and the majority of Americans and medical science and all the other things we actually base out lives on, it doesn't matter. Nothing matters when you're convinced that your god feels a certain way. And look what happens when you gather a bunch of Bible-beating reactionaries together, stir them up with fear of a black president and give them any degree of power.

They become above the law.
Mar 30
The Hutaree

A tattered American flag is taped to the antenna of a van at the home of Thomas William Piatek Monday, March 29, 2010, in Whiting, Ind. Piatek is one of nine suspects tied to a Christian militia that was preparing for the Antichrist and are charged with conspiring to kill police officers, then attack a funeral using homemade bombs in the hopes of killing more law enforcement personnel, federal prosecutors said Monday. The Michigan-based group, called Hutaree, planned to use the attack on police as a catalyst for a larger uprising against the government, according to newly unsealed court papers. U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade said agents moved on the group because its members were planning a violent mission sometime in April. (AP Photo/(M. Spencer Green)



I don't know if I can put it much better than Mark Potok explains it here. People are led to believe one thing and they act in a certain way based on those beliefs. Whether it's Jesus or an anti-Christ or the New World Order or some one-world government — these fears inform people's decisions. Are the people evil? Do they seek to harm because they delight in it? Or do they act in these reprehensible ways because their minds can't properly determine the difference between reality and fear? Of course people like this, whose fear-roasted minds instinctively act defensively, are going to stock pile weapons and attempt to kill hundreds. In their imaginations, police, government, the U.N., atheists, are their oppressors. This is what happens when people are taught that faith is a virtue. When critical thinking and rationality are replaced with dogma and fear.

This group, presumably, is acting in a way that they think is logical to overthrow their oppressors, among them, perhaps, the anti-Christ. But I'm willing to bet they haven't really considered that they are the crazy ones. That the U.N. don't seek to take over the world. That there is no anti-Christ. I wouldn't be surprised if they never even wondered why it is that they believe in an anti-Christ or whether it makes sense to accept that belief.

Some have told me that religion 'just is' as if it has a natural societal origin like trade or sex. Besides this being the naturalistic fallacy, it's not even accurate that religion is natural. It's a system devised to control people and even if that original control worked to most people's benefit, it clearly leads to unreasonable thinking today. It's expired. What once over-road people's base desires to eat rotten meat and rape left and right now only overrides reason and intellect. Had these people held their beliefs about Jesus or the New World Order or whatever up to the light and really examined whether it was true, they probably wouldn't have been sure enough to set a bombing plan into motion. But since religions often consider it an offense to question the religion, these people are prevented from developing the critical thinking skills that could have led them to see they were making terrible, terrible choices.

In one of the more telling comments in this piece, Potok says the group's name is a made-up word. They're a people with no connection to anything. Just angry, looking to hitch the star of their ignorance onto an equally ignorant wagon, and imagine the surprise that Christianity won their affection. (Christianity, and of course, certain cable news conspiracy theorists.)

« Previous Entries Next Entries »